English
What is changing in Romanian construction permitting
These are translations of our Romanian articles. The Romanian text is the original and the one that governs, because the law it reads is Romanian. Citește în română.
-
Technical designThe anexă tehnică: the area table
Point 3 of the technical annex has a total that does not add everything up. Existing buildings stay out, and the printed formula is retained plus proposed.
-
Client guideSplitting or merging land: the certificate
Cadastral operations have their own urbanism certificate, issued in 10 working days. Without it, or against its conditions, the deeds are absolutely void.
-
Council practiceThe two înștiințări: starting and finishing
The permit holder notifies twice. At the start, the issuing authority and I.S.C. At the end, only the issuer, who forwards it. Articles 278 and 280.
-
Legislative changeThe register of construcții, not of clădiri
The Cod sets up the Registrul național al construcțiilor. Buildings are a subset of it, defined in article 417. Who writes into it, and from when.
-
Legislative changeA change of use counts as an intervention
The code lists eighteen kinds of intervention and groups them into eight classes. Change of use sits there, with everything that follows for your file.
-
CostsThe inspectorate levy: the second 0.5%
The permit fee is 0.5% under the fiscal code. The levy owed to the state construction inspectorate is a different 0.5%, on a different base, paid in two parts.
-
Client guideFive things before the first day on site
The permit does not entitle you to start tomorrow. Article 514 lists five obligations that come first, and skipping two of them carries a fixed fine.
-
PerspectiveThe duty that starts after you move in
Monitoring a building over time applies to every construction except CC1, lasts as long as the building does, and falls to the client, not the builder.
-
Technical designThe NZEB report nobody has written about
Complementary documentation now includes an energy conformity report. The code asks for it through the urbanism certificate without saying what it contains.
-
CostsCompulsory insurance, and your exemption
The code requires insurance from everyone involved in building, the client included. The exemption for your own home can be used exactly once.
-
Client guideWhat title to the land the permit needs
Ownership is not the only title accepted, but a lease will not get you a house. Article 245 separates rights in rem from merely contractual rights.
-
PerspectiveIndependence defined by what you may not be
The code never says what an independent check of a building is. Four times over, it says who may not carry one out. The difference shows on small sites.
-
Council practiceYour site has been stopped. What follows
A stop order can carry measures few people anticipate: conservation at the developer's expense, a ban on entry, seals, disconnection from the utilities.
-
Technical designThe measured survey: what detailed means
When you intervene in an existing building the survey usually comes first: dimensioned plans of every level, sections and elevations, sometimes damage.
-
Legislative changeYou sell the land mid-build. The permit?
Two paragraphs settle what happens when land with a live project is sold: permit, certificate and approvals transfer by law, with no application.
-
Technical designThe consequence class decides who checks your project
Importance categories A to D are gone. The designer assigns the consequence class, it decides who checks the project, and assigning a lower one is forbidden.
-
Technical designThe topographic study: three conditions before content
A surveyor's signature is not enough. Article 265 asks for Stereo 70, an ANCPI-authorised person, ANCPI acceptance, and a long list of things on the ground.
-
PerspectiveThe permit is annulled, the house is built
If a court annuls the building permit, the building does not come down automatically. Article 364 leaves an opening, conditional on a technical report.
-
Technical designWhat approvals a protected zone needs
The regime of the land decides the list. Article 349 sets out five situations, from cultural heritage to transport infrastructure and special zones.
-
CostsConstruction waste: who pays for it
The waste management plan is the permit holder's duty, and the costs fall on the producer. It applies to notified works as well as permitted ones.
-
Client guideRegistering a newly built house
The code sets out how registration works for one route, the notified one, and ties it to an entry in a National Construction Register that is not live yet.
-
Technical designThe technical report model and the wrong annex
The code sets four different content frameworks and in two of them the document is not even called a technical report. A downloaded model comes from one.
-
Council practiceA refusal comes with reasons, in writing
The issuing authority may reject the application or make issuing conditional on a redesign. A refusal must set out the reasons in law and in fact behind it.
-
Legislative changeWhere criminal liability begins
The code separates criminal offences from administrative ones. At monuments and in protected built zones, unpermitted work carries prison or a fine.
-
Council practiceWho issues the building permit
The rule is the town hall, but the code sets three exceptions. And where a locality cannot fill the arhitect-sef post, the duties pass to someone else.
-
Technical designInstallations in the permit dossier
At permit stage, installations are presented in principle: schemes, tables, sketches. The full design comes later, and the rule turns on the consequence class.
-
Council practiceWhat the town hall must publish about permits
The list of urbanism certificates is displayed monthly, and permits and refusals become public within 30 days. It can be checked from outside.
-
Client guideAfter the notification: what is no longer asked
The code drops technical checking for notified works and moves responsibility onto the designers. With one exception that requires two ground studies.
-
Client guideSigning off a house you built yourself
Notified works may be carried out in-house, and the handover is signed by three parties: the builder, the beneficiary and a town hall representative.
-
Technical designTechnical expert reports on existing buildings
Not every intervention needs an expert report, and whoever produced the project cannot review it. Two rules, from articles 435 and 438, read off the text.
-
Technical designThe site plan: what annex 2 actually requires
Scale, the Stereo 70 system, the cadastre visa and two photographs. Plus the condition everyone misses: all the public space the plot touches.
-
Technical designThe fire-safety scenario at permit stage
The urbanism code mentions it exactly once, and not as a dossier piece. At permit stage you file the technical memo, and the scenario develops out of it.
-
Technical designGeotechnical study or expert report? Three thresholds
Article 289 says exactly when a study is no longer enough: excavation over 6 m deep, difficult sloping foundation ground, retaining walls above 3 m.
-
Technical designWhen a project checker is actually required
The code does not require a checker on every project: for consequence class CC1 it is not necessary, and responsibility stays entirely with the designers.
-
Technical designYour paperwork says DTAC. Is it still valid?
The urbanism code renamed the documentation on 25 August. What happens to dossiers started before that date, read off article 582 of the code.
-
Technical designDTAD is now PAD. What changes for demolition
The demolition documentation has a new name, but the rule that matters is another: demolition followed by new building goes into a single permit.
-
Technical designDTOE is gone. What you authorise now
The code replaced the site-organisation documentation with a separate permit. And the abbreviation POE, which circulates online, appears nowhere in it.
-
Technical designThe permit project is not the build project
What you commission for the permit and what you commission to build are two different phases. Plus the simplified content for small rural houses.
-
Technical designThe modification permit, step by step
When a change of brief needs a new permit, when a site instruction settles it, and when it sends you back to the start of the whole procedure.
-
Legislative changeThe transition calendar, on real deadlines
The code applies from 25 August, but seven different clocks run behind it, some into 2031. What unlocks when, and which dates are only our arithmetic.
-
Technical designThe building logbook goes electronic
The code wants it digital, uploaded to the national construction register, and ties it to selling the property. Who produces it and who keeps it current.
-
CostsWhy we cannot say what it costs in your town
This is not caution, it is the code's structure: three of the four cost layers are set locally or by each issuer. How to find out yourself, in four steps.
-
Client guideWhat happens after you file the documentation
Ten days for deficiencies, three months to complete, thirty to issue. And one paragraph that turns every aviz into a condition of the permit itself.
-
Council practiceWhat the code standardises and what stays local
The code fixes deadlines and bans baseless avize, but leaves the organising to each primărie. A map of what will carry on differing between towns.
-
Technical designWho signs the design, and what they answer for
The code ties the signature to acquired competence and bans adopting someone else's design. What that means for whoever commissions the documentation.
-
Council practiceThe single approval commission, in practice
One point of contact for avize, but five categories stay outside it. Why the commission does not necessarily shorten your file's critical path.
-
Council practiceThe single national window: five years, in stages
The code describes it as a central system but brings it in over five years. What works until then, and why it matters for a file you submit today.
-
Client guideThe order of steps, read off the code's deadlines
Certificate, avize, filing, issue. The code gives each step a deadline, and adding them all up says more about the real duration than any estimate.
-
Legislative changeExtending a permit: forbidden and allowed
Article 309 forbids extension in paragraph (5) and grants it in paragraph (6). How we read the tension, and the conclusion that holds either way.
-
CostsThe local territory-equipment tax
The code hands local councils a new tax, strictly earmarked and with no amount written anywhere. Why it is the largest cost unknown in the whole code.
-
Client guideDo you qualify for simplified notification?
Three ways in, five possible answers, and a start date that is not the one most people remember. How to check all of it before you prepare the file.
-
CostsWhat a permit actually costs, in layers
The code sets who collects and when, but almost no amounts. The four layers of cost, and why only one of them can be found in a single place.
-
Legislative changeWhat the Codul urbanismului actually repealed
Legea 50/1991 and Legea 350/2001 are gone. But the repeal list has exceptions, and some of the old rules stay in force until something replaces them.
-
PerspectiveDoes tacit approval actually shorten anything?
The simplified notification brings a 15-working-day term and tacit approval. We think total elapsed time changes far less than it appears to.
-
PerspectiveThe forms changed. The websites did not
The code took effect on 25 August and the forms changed on the 26th. Many sources, ours included, still show the old models. Why that matters.
-
PerspectiveThe one-year window for regularisation
The code opens regularisation to other buildings too, but for one year and at ten times the charges. Why we think it gets used early or not at all.
Your certificat de urbanism file, in 30 seconds
AutoRize generates the application, the memoriu de prezentare and the opis for the certificat de urbanism, matched to local planning rules.
Get started